Skip to main content

Woolf V. Mead



Virginia Woolf:
1. It is useful to point out that this essay was originally delivered to women students at two Oxford colleges. Ask your students to identify what evidence there is to suggest Woolf was aware of the nature of her audience.
I think that the sensitivity shown towards obstacles women would and have faced shows clearly that she was aware of here female audience. Also you can sense a change of tone when it comes to addressing opinions of males.

2. What do the chapter headings from Trevelyan’s History of England (para. 6) reveal about historians’ concerns?
The chapter headings portray that women had little assistance in great movements and that their primary duties were to marry and bear children.

3. What would Woolf propose as the most important changes in society that would alter the situation most talented women find themselves in? Why does talent make a woman’s situation especially difficult?
 Woolf proposes that  women should be encouraged to use their gifts in society. It was especially difficult to be talented due to the notion that women could do no such thing and they were purposed to be child bearers and to take care of home.




M. Mead:
1. What are the temperamental traits of women? Of men?
Women were said to be weak and submissive while males were expected to be strong, dominate, and indubitable.

2. What price does a society pay for restricting the opportunities of one sex or the other?
Such society experiences unbalance, sacrifices distinction, caps the growth of many fields, as well as cause some to perish because society does or did not have a sufficient role for them.

3. Given that our culture has standardized temperamental expectations for each sex, what price does the opposite sex pay for that standardization?
The individual can become overwhelmed by personal frustrations, prone to violent outburst, and  for the opposite sex it can causes resentfulness towards them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Plato &. Freud

PLATO QUESTIONS: 1. Consider the issue of what it is we know when we rely on our senses. Is sensory knowledge as unreliable as Plato thinks it is? Personally, I believe that each individual's perception is based on a number of factors. Those factors become how we analyze the things we sense which in fact can be from a faulty point of view.  2. Are we materialistic when we praise sense perception? What are the alternatives to any such materialism arising from overvaluing (or solely valuing) sense experience? In opinion, I believe that our praise of sense perception would be more narcissistic than materialistic. I think it is the cause if lack of conscience knowledge. 3. If we could perceive the world beneath sense experience, what would it be like? I find it hard to answer this question as I can not predict a different reality. I would guess that our perception would rathe be based off of facts and conscience which I believe would create a more just world.

Wollstonecraft, Kozol, & Woodson

1. Define the phrase "pernicious effects" on the basis of what is stated in the essay. The effects caused by genderized roles in society. 2. Is it possible to compare women with property on the basis of this essay? 3. Clarify in what way the “unnatural distinctions” affecting women in society cause them to behave as Wollstonecraft says they do. Do you feel it is a genuine cause- and-effect relationship? Women in society are prevented from fullfilliing their moral duties. 4. Describe Diversity in Schools according to Kozol and what your definition would be. Including present day civil right issues in lessons, have a mix of ethnicities together. 5. What does Woodson mean by mis-education?  He is referring to the Africans and African American peopled are not preoperly educated due to the disadvantages that easily come with being a minority.